Lots of good came out of the presidential election. One was a majority of Americans now see the liberal, pro-abortion media for what it is. The worst of the lot is the New York Times, and they’ve admitted experiencing a major rebellion by their readers. The number of complaints they received regarding their biased coverage of the election was five times the normal. It’s the largest amount of feedback the paper has gotten since 9/11 — and they’re angry about the way the paper favored Hillary Clinton. Social media and the internet have changed the political landscape. Gone are the days when we only get the news from a select few sources with a political agenda. You can be part of the solution. Please share your pro-life beliefs through email and on social media sites.
Back
New York Times Takes It On the Chin
Bradley Mattes | November 29, 2016
April 18, 2024
Perinatal Hospice, the Most Loving Option
Few things in life derail a parent’s world more than being informed that the unborn baby they were excitedly anticipating...
Read MoreApril 11, 2024
Abortion and Cardiovascular Diseases
A variety of health risks are associated with pregnancy loss defined as abortion or miscarriage. They include but are not...
Read MoreApril 05, 2024
Normalizing Euthanasia, the Façade is Gone.
Enemies of life are now openly attempting to normalize euthanasia, painting it as the responsible thing to do if you...
Read More
Leave a Reply