Supreme Court on Chemical Abortion Law

Back
Placeholder Image

Supreme Court on Chemical Abortion Law

Bradley Mattes   |   June 12, 2018

The US Supreme Court has refused to hear the appeal against Arkansas’ law that includes protections for women undergoing chemical abortion pill procedures.  It requires abortionists hold a contract with a physician who has admitting privileges at a hospital and is qualified to treat women with resultant complications.  The Court’s impact on future pro-life legislation is unknown.  Perhaps the greatest good to come from it is highlighting the dangers associated with chemical abortion.  Women have been abandoned by abortionists when serious complications arise.  Studies have shown emergency room admissions for issues like hemorrhaging and incomplete abortion are common.  Contrary to what the abortion industry says, chemical abortion harms women.

 

 

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Latest News

From our articles & videos

View all

April 11, 2024

Abortion and Cardiovascular Diseases

A variety of health risks are associated with pregnancy loss defined as abortion or miscarriage. They include but are not...

Read More

April 05, 2024

Normalizing Euthanasia, the Façade is Gone.

Enemies of life are now openly attempting to normalize euthanasia, painting it as the responsible thing to do if you...

Read More

March 27, 2024

The Supreme Court Hears Chemical Abortion Challenge

Yesterday the United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments in FDA v. Alliance Hippocratic Medicine and Danco Laboratories, L.L.C. v....

Read More