Terminal Does Not Mean Dying

Back
Placeholder Image

Terminal Does Not Mean Dying

Bradley Mattes   |   April 05, 2018

Deceit was used to convince Oregon voters to approve a physician-assisted suicide measure twenty years ago.  Craig New with the Oregon Health Authority admitted their definition of “terminal illness” for patients to qualify was quite different than the voters’.  Turns out my son who’s an insulin-dependent diabetic qualifies as terminally ill if he chooses not to take his medicine.  There’s little accountability.  New says any doctor who declares a patient “terminal” and gets a physician to agree, can prescribe lethal medication, and adds, “The patient gets to decide the part about whether ‘all hope is gone.’”  So, with my chronic pain, can I jump aboard the “life-is-no-good-anymore” bandwagon and be declared “terminal” and end my life?  This is highly disturbing.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Latest News

From our articles & videos

View all

April 18, 2024

Perinatal Hospice, the Most Loving Option

Few things in life derail a parent’s world more than being informed that the unborn baby they were excitedly anticipating...

Read More

April 11, 2024

Abortion and Cardiovascular Diseases

A variety of health risks are associated with pregnancy loss defined as abortion or miscarriage. They include but are not...

Read More

April 05, 2024

Normalizing Euthanasia, the Façade is Gone.

Enemies of life are now openly attempting to normalize euthanasia, painting it as the responsible thing to do if you...

Read More