Rights for Rivers but Not Babies

Back
Placeholder Image

Rights for Rivers but Not Babies

Bradley Mattes   |   March 29, 2017

More and more environmental organizations are voicing support for abortion as a way to protect the environment.  Now we’re seeing laws bestowing rights to nature, such as rivers in New Zealand and the United Kingdom.  As a result, anyone can sue in a court of law in the name of defending nature.  So rivers, plants and animals would have the same rights as human beings.  It’s no leap in logic to impose abortion on demand throughout pregnancy because human beings are considered a blight on nature.  Even cities like Santa Monica, California, where there’s really no nature to protect, instituted a law recognizing the “rights of nature.”   Make no mistake, radical environmentalism has become a zealous religion that’s imposing its belief on society at the expense of innocent human life.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Latest News

From our articles & videos

View all

March 27, 2024

The Supreme Court Hears Chemical Abortion Challenge

Yesterday the United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments in FDA v. Alliance Hippocratic Medicine and Danco Laboratories, L.L.C. v....

Read More

March 26, 2024

SCOTUS Hears Oral Arguments on Chemical Abortion

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: March 26, 2024| Link Contact: Victor Nieves, vnieves@lifeissues.org 513-719-5813 SCOTUS Hears Oral Arguments on Chemical Abortion Today...

Read More

March 21, 2024

World Down Syndrome Day

Today is World Down Syndrome Day. The date was selected because Down syndrome occurs when an extra 3rd of the...

Read More