More and more environmental organizations are voicing support for abortion as a way to protect the environment. Now we’re seeing laws bestowing rights to nature, such as rivers in New Zealand and the United Kingdom. As a result, anyone can sue in a court of law in the name of defending nature. So rivers, plants and animals would have the same rights as human beings. It’s no leap in logic to impose abortion on demand throughout pregnancy because human beings are considered a blight on nature. Even cities like Santa Monica, California, where there’s really no nature to protect, instituted a law recognizing the “rights of nature.” Make no mistake, radical environmentalism has become a zealous religion that’s imposing its belief on society at the expense of innocent human life.
Back
Rights for Rivers but Not Babies
Bradley Mattes | March 29, 2017
March 27, 2024
The Supreme Court Hears Chemical Abortion Challenge
Yesterday the United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments in FDA v. Alliance Hippocratic Medicine and Danco Laboratories, L.L.C. v....
Read MoreMarch 26, 2024
SCOTUS Hears Oral Arguments on Chemical Abortion
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: March 26, 2024| Link Contact: Victor Nieves, vnieves@lifeissues.org 513-719-5813 SCOTUS Hears Oral Arguments on Chemical Abortion Today...
Read MoreMarch 21, 2024
World Down Syndrome Day
Today is World Down Syndrome Day. The date was selected because Down syndrome occurs when an extra 3rd of the...
Read More
Leave a Reply