|
Radio
Transcript
LIFE ISSUES NO. 2091
KOOP AND REAGAN
Recently, Planned Parenthood
in Mexico publicized widely that, back in the 1980's, President
Reagan and Surgeon General Koop had both concluded that abortion
was safe and that it left no bad after-effects. I faxed a
thorough refutation to Mexico City, and after that I flipped
back to a program on this issue that I had recorded back then.
It is the answer. Let me repeat what I said then:
Much has been said recently
about the Surgeon General's report to President Reagan on
the after-effects of abortion. You may recall that President
Reagan, in 1987, asked the Surgeon General to prepare such
a report.
Dr. Koop first asked me
at National Right to Life, of which I was president, and then
asked Planned Parenthood to prepare for him what each thought
the report should say. He also went on to interview 25 other
groups.
Dr. Koop waited until two
weeks before President Reagan went out of office. He then
turned in, not a lengthy report, as requested, but rather
only a three-and-a-half-page letter. The letter was shamelessly
misquoted. Let me give you the essence of his message. He
said: `I have concluded that, at this time, the available
scientific evidence about the psychological aftermath of abortion
simply cannot support either the preconceived beliefs of those
who are pro-life or the preconceived beliefs of those who
are pro-abortion.'
He noted that there were
over 250 scientific studies that dealt with the psychological
aftermath of abortion. He and his staff had reviewed them,
and `All were found to be flawed. The data do not support
the premise that abortion does, nor do they support the premise
that abortion does not, cause or contribute to psychological
problems. Anecdotal reports abound on both sides.'
Flawed? Yes. None were long-term,
prospective, double blind, well-controlled, in-depth studies.
The kind of definitive proof that he wanted simply wasn't
there, even though he said that there are plenty of individual
cases of post-abortion syndrome that have been reported.
But here is the end of his sentence:
There is no valid scientific proof that abortion
is safe. He then asked for $10 million to do a study
that could start yielding data after the first year and
a massive five-year study that would cost $100 million. Neither
was funded.
Even today, friends and
today in Mexico the press keeps quoting Dr. Koop as
saying there were no bad effects from abortion. But they fail
to report the sentence immediately following which said there
was also no scientific proof that abortion was safe. Let's
remember to use that second sentence in the Surgeon General's
report. Legal? Yes, but safe? There was no proof even back
then that abortions were safe.
[07/12/99]
|