|
Radio
Transcript
LIFE ISSUES NO. 1631
AMELIA KLEPACKA
Today I have a heart-warming story from England.
This happened before their general election a few months ago.
It seems that a local candidate for parliament, Barbara Follett,
had a strong pro-abortion position. She was a founder
of their "Emily's List" which is the same pro-abortion,
political fund-raising group that we have here in the United
States. Follett was invited to be the guest of honor
and to give junior school awards to students at the John Henry
Neumann School in Stevange, England.
Fourteen-year-old Amelia Klepacka, one of six from
a poor family, had won an award for modern languages.
When Amelia heard who was to be the guest of honor and give
her that award, she refused to accept it. Amelia said:
"My conscience will not allow me to accept the prize
from someone who is anti-life in the things she has
done, and proposes to do, and who discriminates against Catholics
who wish to become members of parliament."
The schoolgirl said she was "doing it for the
people who have no voice and for the babies who are being
killed in the abortion death camps of England."
She said that by letting Mrs. Follett into the school, the
headmaster was giving credibility to her policies and was
providing a platform for her views.
Continuing, Amelia said, "This is encouraging
the parents to vote for her, which is exactly what she wants.
She is not the sort of person who should be a member of parliament.
Babies, for her, have no choice. If Barbara Follett
says she is pro-choice, that means she is pro-abortion."
Amelia is the third child in her family. Her mother
had done pregnancy counseling for many years, and the entire
family has joined others praying outside of abortion clinics.
Her sister Maria founded a movement called "Youth for
Life". And earlier this year, her mother had written
the headmaster at the school saying, "I hereby confirm
that we wish to take advantage of our statutory right to withdraw
all of our children - Beatta, Amelia and Camilla - from sex
education classes in any subject which attempts to cover sex
education."
Well, her story hit the headlines and was reflected
in columns of newspapers all across England. Some supported,
some objected, but they all heard the story.
Letters of support poured in. "Bravo! --
Congratulations for the stand you have taken -- do not waver
-- do not give in -- we remember you in our prayers."
-- "There are children yet unborn who will live as a
result of your actions" -- "Thank you for your courageous
stand." -- "How brave a young lady you are.
Have you thought of becoming a member of parliament?"
-- "You are a bright light in a wicked world. Love
and blessings to you." And so, on and on the comments
continued.
A major journalist in the London Times summed it up
this way: "Politicians' current obsession is with
the havoc wreaked on society by dysfunctional families and
the effects of poverty on morality. Perhaps they should
pause to observe exactly how a functional family produces
six intelligent, high-achieving children with very little
money, but with an almost terrifying moral certitude."
Well, let me tell you, would that there were more such
families and that more of us could be accused of "terrifying
moral certitude". Seems to me Jesus was.
[10/06/97]
|