|
Life Issues Connector: July 1998
|
Articles may be reproduced with acknowledgment of their source.
Abortion Clinic Chain Operator Now
Pro-Life and Speaking Out
Eric Harrah was part owner of one of the
nation's largest chains of abortion clinics. He recently converted to
Christianity and walked away from the lucrative business of killing unborn
children. Dr. Willke and Brad Mattes interviewed him regarding his involvement
in the abortion industry.
Dr. W: I am curious about your function in
the clinic. Were you basically a business manager, owner?
Eric: I was an owner. My first position was
Director of Public Relations and then I became an owner and from there
went around opening clinics – that was my biggest function with my
different partners.
Brad: How did you select areas to open abortion
clinics?
Eric: There were a lot of different factors
that went into a decision to open a clinic. Basically, you looked in an
area that didn’t have a clinic in it. You would get demographic numbers,
from areas that had colleges or universities, with the amount of abortions
that had taken place prior to that. If it had a high abortion rate, that
would be a prime area.
Dr. W: How would you hire the abortionists?
Eric: Well, before you would even go to a
town, you would usually have your doctors lined up. A lot of times, doctors
would contact me. There was always some doctor somewhere in some town
who was already doing abortions. Also, in larger demographic areas (metropolitan
areas) it was easy to tap any number of residency programs.
Dr. W: These were residents who’d moonlight?
Eric: That was not all I hired, but that
was a very nice pool to be able to select from, because they were interested.
You take a resident, bring him into an abortion clinic and they work part-time,
even just one day a week. They can make $75,000 a year, if not more, which
is very beneficial to pay off their student loans.
Brad: How many states did you have clinics
in?
Eric: About 11 or 12.
Brad: And how many abortions did your chain
of abortion clinics do?
Eric: If I take all the numbers from the
time I started in the abortion industry to the time I got out (10 years),
we probably did about a quarter of a million total.
Brad: Were the abortions that were done in
your clinics limited to first trimester abortions?
Eric: Oh, no. People in the abortion business
don’t want to do first trimester abortions. That’s not where
the money is. The money is in mid-second to early third trimester abortions.
Dr. W: But you can’t do those in every
clinic – or do you?
Eric: No. Every place has different laws.
In New Jersey, you can only go to 14 weeks in a clinic setting, but what
you do is get approved and open up a surgi-center where you can get abortions
done. Pennsylvania, which prides itself on having some of the strictest
abortion laws, actually has some of the most lenient and is a mecca for
late-term abortions. They go to 24 or 26 weeks – that’s in a
clinic setting. Delaware is 22-24 weeks – that’s in an office
setting.
Dr. W: Now these would be – what –
D&E’s mostly?
Eric: D&E’s and D&X’s.
I would never permit saline abortions to be done.
Brad: Did your staff ever delay women’s
abortions so that they were kicked up into the more expensive category?
Eric: I personally never did myself. You
have to understand that I became (I hope this doesn’t offend you,
but I want to be totally honest) a lover with Dr. Steven Bringham, who
I’m sure you’ve known or have heard of. And he was pretty infamous
for that type of thing. He was also known for re-using syringes and all
kinds of other things that I wouldn’t do.
Brad: And he continues to perform abortions?
Eric: Yes, he does. But he gets sentenced
on Monday, so he might be in jail. I don’t know what his situation
is going to be.
Brad: Did pro-life efforts ever stop one
of your clinics from opening?
Eric: None of mine.
Brad: Would you have any advice for pro-lifers
on what they might do to effectively stop a clinic now?
Eric: Oh, there are so many things they could
do. You would have to do a whole separate newsletter on it. I go around
speaking now to right-to-life groups clueing them in on what to do.
Brad: Are there effective ways the pro-life
movement can stop abortion clinics from opening?
Eric: Oh, there are many peaceful, nonviolent
ways that are totally legal that would not be part of the supposed, alleged
RICO conspiracy by now. Yes, look into and act while your town does not
have an abortion clinic in it. Enact laws preventing medical, surgical
centers from being located within the city limits. Most towns don’t
worry about this until it happens, and by the time it happens, it’s
too late. You can pass very legitimate restrictions. There are laws they
can pass about hazardous waste..
Brad: How did you get into the abortion area
to begin with?
Eric: I was with some friends on our way
to the beach, and we saw a right-to-life protest. I didn’t even know
there was an abortion clinic in my hometown. At that time I considered
myself to be pro-choice. I was very liberal, politically. We pulled into
the clinic and asked if there was anything we could do to help. They said
we could join NOW. I joined. I became secretary of my county chapter.
A year later I became vice president of the Delaware state chapter, and
a year-and-a-half after that, I became their first male ever elected president.
I quit my affiliation with NOW years ago. I started to become very disturbed
by a lot of their rhetoric, a lot of their hate, a lot of what I perceived
to be their racism. You have groups such as NOW, the National Abortion
Rights Action League and many other groups who do nothing but live off
the blood of aborted children. Their interest in keeping abortion legal
is not so much because they care about women’s rights – or that
they are actually pro-choice. Their true interest in keeping abortion
legal, in my opinion, is so they can keep their big, fancy offices in
Washington, their nice clothing expenses and their personal expense accounts.
Brad: When you were involved in this industry,
what was your annual income?
Eric: When I walked away from the clinics,
I walked away from everything. I left my ownership and my money there.
I wanted nothing else to do with it. The average doctor who does abortions
one day a week at a clinic averages 25-40 abortions. He will walk away
in his pocket with an average of $100,000-$125,000 a year. An average
clinic that performs roughly around 8,000 abortions will gross approximately
$1 million a year.
Dr. W: One doctor can do that? That’s
full time, though.
Eric: No, it’s not. Not at all. Abortion
clinics, Dr. Willke, are set up like cattle slaughtering centers. You
get ‘em in and you get ‘em out. I would say, honestly, about
60%-70% of all abortions takes place on Saturdays.
Brad: How many women do they usually schedule
in a day?
Eric: The maximum I’ve ever seen get
done in a day is probably 50-60 women. Usually, that takes two abortionists,
but I have seen doctors kick out 40-50 patients by themselves. First trimester
cases – if you have a doctor who’s been doing it for a while
and he knows what he’s doing – you can push through 6-7 an hour.
And that goes back to the whole issue too of how little regulation there
is. Even within PA, which prides itself on being the bastion for restrictive
abortion laws, there really are no regulations. There’s nobody to
monitor these facilities. There’s nobody who tracks the money that
comes from the birth control companies that flood through the clinics
– the paybacks. There’s nobody who tracks the insurance companies
that give incentives to physicians for performing abortions, because insurance
companies would rather pay for abortions than pay for a full labor and
delivery.
Dr. W: You get those incentive payments?
Eric: Oh yeah, they flow like water. If you’re
a participating member of an insurance company, they will give you incentives
to perform an abortion. First trimester abortions are $250, and insurance
companies such as…I’ve seen them pay over $2,000 for those abortions,
because they would rather pay $2,000-$2,500 for a first trimester case
than pay $7,000-$8,000 for prenatal, labor and delivery.
Brad: So do you, as the clinic owner, pocket
that money?
Eric: Oh, definitely.
Brad: Let me ask you about your attitude
and contact with the women.
Eric: I would make their appointments. I
would sit and talk to them in the waiting room. I would go into the procedure
rooms with them. When I first got started, I was very truly concerned
about the women who were having abortions, but, as in most cases, there
are two reasons why people get involved in the abortion industry. The
first is money. The second is because they really feel that it’s
helping women. But even those people who get involved because they think
it’s helping women – at some point in time convert to the fact
that it’s all about money. So you stop looking at women after a certain
point in time as being people that you’re helping and you just start
looking at them as dollar bills.
Brad: That’s what happened to you?
Eric: Definitely. I found myself, probably
the last half of the time that I was involved in the abortion industry,
very depressed about it, which led to a cocaine drug addiction, and toward
the very end, I think I ended up hating them.
Brad: Why was that?
Eric: I think it was because of the depression
and guilt that I felt, myself, and I was blaming them for it – for
coming in and having this abortion – especially the woman that you
would see time and time and time again. There was one patient who came
in and had 16. Even the doctors who do the abortion become hateful toward
the patients – they become mean, rough.
Brad: So the average woman didn’t get
compassionate counseling when she went in there?
Eric: I would say she got counseling, but
compassion – no.
Brad: What kind of counseling did she get?
It’s my impression there hasn’t been much.
Eric: In my facilities, I always gave option
counseling. Of course you make the abortion the most appealing. I told
them about adoption and about foster care and about (when there was welfare)
assistance. The typical way it would go is, "Well, you know you can
place your baby out for adoption." But then, in the second breath
you would say, "That’s an option available to you, but you also
have to realize that there’s going to be a baby of yours out here
somewhere in the world you will never see again.. At least with abortion
you know what’s happening. You can go on with your life."
Brad: So were the options more for your benefit
to ease your conscience than for the women?
Eric: I would say that it was more for my
conscience because, to be honest with you, I really didn’t care.
Dr. W: And the longer you were in it, the
less you cared?
Eric: Yes, exactly, Dr. Willke. The longer
I was in it, the less I cared, so I really didn’t really care what
my conscience said. My conscience was totally numb anyway. But what it
did do was public relations-wise. You were able, when a reporter or TV
crew came, to pull out a packet of information for the patients to read
and they received it. So what can anybody say? Publicly it looked good
– in reality it was another tool that was used to force a woman into
abortion. It’s typical – I would give them an option and then
shoot it down. The only option you didn’t shoot down, obviously,
was abortion.
Eric: And then, again, Dr. Willke and Brad,
if they came in for an abortion – if they were scared, hey, inject
them with some Fentanyl. It costs you two bucks. Knock ‘em out. You
guarantee them they’ll never feel a thing. They’d come in and
say, "Oh, I’m scared to death…. I don’t want to have
this memory for the rest of my life." I’d say, "Sweetheart,
there won’t be any memories. We can give you an anesthetic that will
knock you out. It costs me two bucks, but I’m going to charge you
a hundred bucks extra for it. I’m going to give you some birth control
pills when you leave." And then you have the drug companies
who would come in and throw these lavish parties and dinners for the clinic
staff to get the doctors to write prescriptions for them. The prescriptions
were written not necessarily based on what medication was best for the
patient. It was written on who gave the best party the week before. Did
the rep bring in the best donuts – did the rep bring the best pizza?
Did they give nice golf clubs this year?
Brad: Were there any direct financial incentives
by drug companies?
Eric: Yes, there were.
Eric: And while there was legislation to
curb that, it still goes on. You have to understand that drug reps worked
on commission. Their income is generated by how many of their "scripts"
are being refilled at local pharmacies.
Dr. W: Let me ask about picketing out front.
Did you have that in front of some of your places? And what influence
did that have?
Eric: It depended on what kind of picketing
it was. I found that it did nothing but infuriate people and the woman
who came in. What worked, and what I hated the most, were the sidewalk
counselors who would stand there and give a brochure about the local CPC.
Those were the most effective, because that’s when the girl would
stop to have a conversation.
Dr. W: And some of those women never came
in?
Eric: Yes.
Brad: You saw those dollar bills walking
away.
Eric: You never minded it when the men were
outside picketing, because that was good, especially if they were loud
and obnoxious, telling women they were going to go to hell. That was productive
because they would come in and say, "Who do they think they are telling
me what to do?" Women were much more effective at it than men, definitely.
We knew which one was going to be successful. What I found, in my personal
experience, is that the women didn’t usually respond to younger women
because they would typically look at them and say, "You’re my
age – what do you know?" But who they did respond to was older
women – middle-aged women and senior citizen women because I think,
in their minds, those women had valuable advice.
Dr. W: Did you have escorts to help bring
the women in?
Eric: Yes, at times, yes, we did.
Dr. W: And was that effective on your part?
Eric: It was effective when the picketers
were rowdy. When the picketers were calm, it backfired on you because
it was like you were trying to drag the women in.When the picketers are
loud, women are looking for someone to get them into that clinic. So you
would always hope, on Saturdays especially (that’s the biggest day
for picketing), that the picketers would be rowdy and obnoxious.
Dr. W: Is there any particular piece of literature
that you recall that you feared the most?
Eric: Yes, one by your group, actually, that
I used to hate. It was the one that you did about fetal development.
Dr. W: "Did You Know?"
Eric: Yes, that was the one we hated the
most. That really used to tick us off. And actually what we would do is
(I shouldn’t tell you this, but), the right-to-lifers would get tired
and they would put their stuff down on the sidewalk, and they’re
talking and we’d go over and take all their literature and just run
with it.
Brad: What about your lifestyle as an abortion
clinic owner. Your chain was one of the largest in the nation, is that
correct?
Eric: Yes, it was. The thing I enjoyed, as
an abortionist, were the number of celebrities and politicians who treat
you as though you were a hero. Whoopie Goldberg, Cybil Shepard, Morgan
Fairchild…people who would come to pro-choice functions…politicians
who would actually court you. I had VIP seating at five Supreme Court
nomination hearings.
Brad: You enjoyed material possessions too,
I would imagine.
Eric: Yes. The travel, the money was just
there. It was a very, very comfortable living. And it was easy money.
Dr. W: We hear that the number of abortionists
is declining, is aging, and that worries the industry.
Eric: The number of these abortionists, yes,
is declining, but what is increasing now is what's called "docs in
a box", doctors who hold licenses in anywhere from 5 to 20 states
and spend their time flying from state to state just doing abortions.
You also have what are called "mega-docs" who totally control
a certain geographic area. Those are on the increase.. You should see
the anti-trust laws that are being broken by abortion providers –
the "carteling", as we used to call it, where you would get
together for a friendly lunch and decide what fee was going to be charged.
The reason I was hated so much by the people in the abortion industry
was that I was a cartel-breaker. If I went into a town where first trimester
abortions started out at $275, I would go in and charge $200, because
I knew that the clinic had been around for five or six years and already
had a kind of debt. I was coming in and starting from scratch. The thing
was to go in and force them to shut down. It’s a very cutthroat business,
very backstabbing and very physically dangerous too.
Dr. W: You’ve known doctors doing abortions
who were physically injured or lost their lives?
Eric: No, I never knew of anybody who lost
their lives. I do know doctors who were physically threatened. Usually
the way it happened is, if you were going to go into an area where they
already were, and they didn’t want any competition, they were usually
very friendly. They’d give you a call, telling you that your services
were not needed. If you persisted, they’d persist a little bit heavier.
But I’m not that stupid. It’s not worth my aggravation.
Brad: When you left the industry, you left
everything behind?
Eric: Yes, I did. I didn’t see how I
could call myself a Christian and be living off the fruits of the abortion
business. That made no sense to me. And I prayed about it, and God told
me to leave it all behind.
Dr. W: And what are you living off of now?
Eric: I go around and speak at churches.
I did my first CPC benefit a few months ago – I have a couple more
of those booked. I’m writing a book.
Brad: Tell us about your book.
Eric: The book I’m writing tells the
story of my life in the abortion business. But it’s also a tell-all
book about the abortion industry itself and it also gets into the areas
of my life I was involved in, which was homosexuality and how prevalent
homosexuality actually is in the abortion business. "The girls do
carry on," as we used to say.
Dr. W: Homosexual males or homosexual females?
Eric: Both, and I’ll tell you what –
the lesbians are far worse than the males. Anytime you have a feminist
health care center that does abortions, they’re often all lesbians.
Within the abortion business itself, there’s this love/hate relationship
between the feminists and the abortion doctors, because the majority of
the doctors are men.
Dr. W: You’re doing something they want
done…
Eric: But they hate you because you’re
a man. Over the last couple of years groups such as NOW, NARAL and The
Fund no longer control the abortion industry. They did for a while, but
the feminists no longer control it. What you have now is a bigger struggle
going on now between them and Planned Parenthood. Planned Parenthood is
hated by any doctor or [abortion] clinic that is independently owned and
operated. Their [Planned Parenthood] bread and butter is the abortions
that they do. They don’t do it because they care about women. That’s
where the majority of their money comes from. Planned Parenthood is shrewd,
though, because it’s easier for a politician to stand behind Planned
Parenthood to support them than it is to stand behind some entrepreneurial
businessman or woman who has an independent clinic. It’s more socially
acceptable.
Dr. W: Yes, PP has an image of doing it legitimately.
Eric: Yes, but what PP also has within the
business itself is their record of being racist, squashing competition
and outright lying about competition to squash them. What PP wants is
a monopoly in the abortion business.
Brad: Tell us about how you switched from
pro-abortion to pro-life.
Eric: I grew up in the Church, so I knew
that abortion was wrong. I’d say about the last five years I was
having serious depression and guilt over my involvement, which led to
my cocaine addiction. I saw myself doing things like, in the morning,
getting up and watching the 700 Club, just trying to have some tie back
to my Christian roots, I guess you could say. Finally, when I came to
State College in Pennsylvania to open a clinic (which I didn’t want
to come here), it was nice to have someone – a right-to-life group
– who came to me and didn’t ridicule me or call me names but
reached out to me.
Brad: Give us some detail of how they reached
out to you.
Eric: Well, there was a big battle getting
the clinic open here in State College. I was on the front page of the
paper, I think, for forty-some odd days straight. It was the biggest news
story, I think, ever to hit this town. There were protests, prayer marches
and all kinds of things that the right-to-lifers did to shoot me down
for opening, but I was able to overcome it. (There’s a whole bunch
of other things that happened behind the scenes that people don’t
know about, which included secret agreements and secret deals with officials
and different things.) So the clinic finally opened and there were massive
protests every day. I said to the people with my clinic: "Don’t
be scared. Right-to-lifers are very fickle ( I still stand behind that).
They will come out and they will picket us very heavily for the first
month or so, and then the numbers will dwindle until eventually there’ll
be hardly anybody here protesting." And that came to pass, as it
always had. But that day, they came and told me that there was a football
team outside picketing, and I went outside with my bodyguards to see what
was going on. There was just one gentleman standing there in a Penn State
football sweatshirt who started talking to me.
Brad: But he reached out to you with love
and not hate and that made the difference?
Eric: Exactly, yes.
Brad: Was it a lonely existence where you
were at that time?
Eric: Oh, it was very lonely. I hated State
College. I had spent the majority of my time shuttling between New York,
Los Angeles, London and Paris. I grew up in small, podunk town and I vowed
that I would get out of it, and I did. I thought that I had failed. I’m
back where I started, even though I really wasn’t. I always tell
the story when I go to speak that a homosexual’s worst nightmare
is to be stuck in a town where there’s no Macy's and no Starbuck's.
This town had neither. It was a very lonely existence, yes. Steven Bringham
decided it was too hot to be here politically, so he stayed back in our
homes in New Jersey and Connecticut.
Brad: You shared homes together then?
Eric: Yes, we did.
Brad: You made a radical change…
Eric: No, I didn’t make a radical change.
God made a radical change in me. I did nothing. I did nothing but bend
to the will of God, like I should have done a long time ago. I did nothing
to change myself – God changed me – because if it was up to
me, and left to my own devices, I can’t save myself and I can’t
change my way of thinking. The old me wouldn’t have walked away from
thousands upon thousands of dollars a week and millions of dollars in
the bank – for what? To go out and get $400 to $1,000 to speak at
a CPC banquet, when I was making a hundred times that a week? It’s
not about me, it’s about God. And that’s what I want people
to understand.
Dr. W: How do you view violence to stop abortions
from being performed?
Eric: I do not accept, nor will I ever tolerate,
anyone who label themselves a Christian or a pro-lifer who advocates violence,
killing someone because they’re involved in the abortion business.
That person is not pro-life.
Dr. W: I agree with you strongly.
Eric: Dr. Willke, the reason I agreed to
do an interview with you is because, over the years, you have stayed consistent.
You never advocated violence. Every piece of information I ever saw that
you put out was truthful, it was honest and it was never hate-filled.
Brad: You recently came out of the abortion
industry. Tell us about some of the new things pro-lifers should be concerned
about.
Eric: The non-surgical, Methotrexate/Misoprostil
abortions. That’s a whole other racket. By the time you count the
two medications and the needle you need to give the injection, it’s
going to cost you around $15. I was charging anywhere from $375 and others
charged as much as $600. Now, here’s the big racket they do with
it. They bring these women in and they know it’s only good up until
about 7 or 8 weeks. A woman comes in at 9 or 10 weeks and they tell her
about this wonderful non-surgical abortion. She’s so desperate not
to have to have the surgery that she opts for the non-surgical procedure.
They know it’s going to fail and then they tell her, "Now we’re
going to give this to you, but if it fails, you’re going to have
to pay us for a surgical abortion."
Dr. W: And totally unregulated.
Eric: Dr. Willke, Abortion is totally unregulated!
Anybody can open up an abortion clinic. Almost any doctor can work there,
even anesthesiologists. A psychiatrist
can do an abortion because he or she has MD or DO after their name.
Brad: Did you have experiences in your clinics
with chemical abortions?
Eric: Oh, yes. We were one of the first ones
in the country to do it. And, actually, it got to the point where we'd
say, "You come in, sweetheart. You don’t like needles? That’s
okay, we’ll fix you up on Methotrexate in a glass of orange juice
and it works in the exact same way."
Dr. W: How about the RU 486? Were you in
on any of those trials?
Eric: No, I was never in on any of those
trials because I didn’t want to be because the FDA will regulate
RU 486 very strictly.
Dr. W: You know there’s a certain battle
fatigue out there in Right-to-Life offices.
Eric: I understand that people are tired,
but they need to get re-energized. They need to know that their efforts
have made a difference. Unfortunately, they don’t hear that enough.
Dr. W: The one thing that has really energized
pro-lifers has been partial-birth abortion.
Eric: That has totally floored me! The American
people also need to know, when they talk about abortion at 14, 15 or 16
weeks, you pull a baby apart to get it out. I have seen my fair share
of D&X abortions done over the years. I started to see more abortions
that were done on fetuses where the baby was born whole and was left there
to die. With the advent of new medications to help in labor, there is
not such a need to do the gruesome D&X abortions.
Brad: She essentially went into premature
labor, is that what they did?
Eric: Exactly, yes. They would cause premature
labor, she would be delivered and the fetus would be put aside to die.
Brad: How do you think pro-lifers have fared
in the public forum?
Eric: You know what the most hated commercial
that the right-to-lifers ever put out was? It was "Life, What a Beautiful
Choice". We hated that commercial. It even made me feel guilty, showing
these beautiful babies.
Brad: Did you experience anything with Post-Abortion
Syndrome?
Eric: Yes, it’s rampant – and,
actually, I had Post-Abortion Syndrome. That’s why I became a cocaine
addict. I hated putting babies in strainers and rinsing them off and putting
them in zip-lock bags. I consider myself to be an abortion-survivor because
I was on a fast track of dying because of it. Post-Abortion Syndrome is
very prevalent – very, very prevalent.
Brad: So you saw it in women?
Eric: I saw it in women ten minutes after
the abortion. I saw it in women a year after the abortion. They would
call begging for help.
Brad: What was your response to them?
Eric: "You’ll get over it, sweetie.
Your hormones are going crazy right now. As soon as your hormones calm
down, you’ll be fine." That was the standard line that was given.
Dr. W: And, of course, it didn’t mean
a thing.
Eric: No, it didn’t. But, you know,
it bought you some time with them. It was implanted in their minds that
there was nothing wrong with them. It was their hormones.
Dr. W: And they went away?
Eric: They went away, but at some point in
time, they would usually re-surface again. In my clinic we had protocols
for what to do when people threatened suicide. They would call six months
after the abortion. They couldn’t stand it anymore. They were going
to kill themselves and you had to keep them on the line and then call
a crisis mental center and get intervention.
Brad: So the abortion industry is aware of
Post-Abortion Syndrome?
Eric: Yes, but they deny it.
Dr. W: How about effect on men?
Eric: What I did see was this little game
that was played, where the men would come in with these girls and say,
"Oh, honey, right now is not the right time to have the baby, but
go ahead and have the abortion and we’ll have another baby and get
married soon." Then, as soon as the abortion was over with, he’d
dump her. That happens constantly. And I would tell girls, "Don’t
you even think for a minute that he’s going to be back when you’re
back here for your checkup, because he’s going to be gone."
"No, Eric, it’s not like that. You don’t understand him
like I do." And then, a month later: "You were right, Eric.
He left me."
Dr. W: Sweet-talk her into it and then leave
her there.
Eric: Exactly. Leave her there. I’ve
seen guys drop girls off at the abortion clinic, pay for the abortion,
sit around and wait until they hear the suction machines start –
then they know it’s over and they’re gone. Won’t even take
her home! I’ve seen that more than I can remember. I’ve seen
all kinds of things.
Dr. W: Eric, we really do thank you for your
time and your straightforward answers. I encourage you to keep writing
your book. &127
Life Issues Today with Dr. J.C. Willke
Mothers Who Give Up Babies for Adoption
– How They Fare
To find out let's recall a fine study out
of the U.S. National Center for Health Statistics by Dr. Christine Bachrach.
The area that she reported on is how does thebirth mother fare--the generous
woman who placed her baby in the arms of adoptive parents--as compared
to a single mother who keeps her baby?
Well, Dr. Bachrach has good news for us.
From her report, which is well documented, it is clear that the women
who choose adoption do much better than thoseunmarried women who keep
their babies. Let's look. Only 18% of women who choose adoption later
live below the poverty line. In comparison, 40% of women who kept their
babies live in poverty.
Another way of looking at this is to ask
how many were receiving some kind of public assistance. Here the difference
is even greater. For those who opted for adoption, only 21% were on public
assistance compared to 51% of those who kept their babies.
How about Aid for Dependent Children (AFDC)
- that's the big government program? What are the numbers here? They're
almost startling! Of the single birth mothers who were parenting their
children, 36% were receiving AFDC compared to only 7% of the women who
had placed their babies.
Enough of finances. Let's look at some other
parameters. Another measure of future stability and security is education.
Who finished high school? 77% of those who placed their babies finished,
while only 60% of the birth mothers who kept their babies finished high
school.
What about the stability that marriage brings
later - or certainly should? Does placing a child in an adoptive home
help or hinder the birth mother's chance for a later marriage? It helps,
quite a bit. Of those who kept their children, only 50% married later.
Of those who placed their children, 70% married later.
Let's recall a disturbing report published
a few years ago by a group called Concerned United Birth Parents (CUB).
Its subjects were largely drawn from its own quite selective membership.
Regarding this, we have to assume that this was not a true cross-sectional
representative sample. But that study claimed that adoption was so traumatic
for the mother that such women subsequently had lowered fertility. Dr.
Bachrach's data disproves this.
Her data showed that both groups--those who
chose adoption and those who did not--had an identical fertility rate
of 59% later.
Most of us who counsel and who have been
aware that there are many benefits - benefits to both mother and child
in adopting - were certainly very pleased to see this study. It's good
to have some solid research to back up what our clinical observations
have always shown us. &127
Mainstreaming Euthanasia in Oregon's Medical
Community
The people of Oregon recently passed a referendum
called the Death With Dignity Act. For the first time in America's history,
it allows a physician to prescribe a lethal dose of medication to be self-administered
by a terminally ill patient. Shortly afterwards, the Task Force to Improve
the Care of Terminally-Ill Oregonians was formed. This group of mostly
medical professionals then wrote the "Guidebook for Health Care Providers".
According to its authors, the goal of this publication is "to offer
guidance to health care providers whose patients may be interested in
exploring their options under the provisions of the Death With Dignity
Act." In other words, it’s a how-to book for members of the
medical community in Oregon who wish to help kill their patients.
Task Force is up front in stating their neutrality
regarding physician-assisted suicide. The guidebook states that it was
"designed to be a comprehensive reference book on all aspects of
putting the Act into practice." However, to the wary pro-life reader,
it’s a thinly veiled attempt to mainstream physician-assisted suicide
in Oregon’s medical community. Under the mission heading it reads,
"we wish to facilitate understanding of diverse viewpoints."
Unfortunately, these are often code words for we have a contrary agenda.
The book raises many red flags regarding
how the Task Force is approaching the execution of the Act (no pun intended).
For example, they point out to the physician that the Act does not prohibit
them from bringing up the idea of physician-assisted suicide, thus making
it ethical to plant the idea with the patient. The guidebook also opens
the door for possible assistance with self-administration of the lethal
drug by explaining that the Act doesn’t say how much, if any, aid
someone may give the patient in dying. Having said that, they also point
out that the Act is unclear whether the attending physician may prescribe
an injectable drug for self-administration. It would seem that a subtle
plan is unfolding.
Confidentiality for the patient and health
care providers participating in physician-assisted suicide is a major
concern of the Task Force. The physician is advised to make prior arrangements
with a sympathetic pharmacist to help ensure this confidentiality. Pharmacies
are also urged to "develop procedures to ensure confidentiality for
patients, physicians and pharmacists" (emphasis added). This concern
for confidentiality is a permeating theme throughout the guidebook. They
acknowledge that providers such as pharmacists and hospice nurses have
a right to not be unknowing participants in a morally objectionable action.
"Nevertheless, attending physicians must respect the confidentiality
of the patient’s request unless otherwise waived."
It is the opinion of the Task Force that
if a pharmacist has any question regarding the intent of a particular
prescription, regardless of their willingness to participate in assisted
suicide, it is his or her responsibility to contact the doctor and ask
questions instead of being told up front. Further, physicians and pharmacists
who refuse to participate in the intentional death of a patient are expected
to refer them to someone who will. Perhaps this is what they mean in their
mission statement by facilitating "understanding of diverse viewpoints."
The Task Force has much to say about the
actual administration of lethal prescriptions. Because of "liability
concerns" and as a token olive branch to those who may object to
assisted-suicide, they don’t offer "specific formulas".
Formulas or not, a plethora of how-to information is shared.
Based on their experience with oral medications,
death is likely to occur within 5 hours for most patients after ingestion.
Perhaps the most chilling caution to health care providers by the guidebook
is that the bodies of young people eliminate barbiturates more rapidly
than elderly patients do, so higher doses are recommended to get the lethal
effect. This indicates that they see more than just elderly terminal patients
"benefiting" from the Act.
Serving tips for administering lethal medications
are given with the nonchalance of a cookbook recipe. The barbiturate’s
notoriously bitter taste can be overcome by "mixing the powder with
pureed fruit, fruit juice, pudding or beverage." Artificial sweeteners
are also recommended.
To the Task Force’s credit, they point
out some of the pitfalls of dispensing lethal medication, such as how
to prevent small children or others from having access to these medications
or what should be done with the medication if the patient dies without
taking it. The guidebook also points out that none of the drugs or drug
combinations have been part of a scientific, controlled study for their
intended lethal outcome.
Oregon's Death With Dignity Act, by its vagueness,
at times presents a danger to the rights of those it’s supposedly
designed to protect. For instance, there are currently no mental competency
standards. How will they decide who is mentally competent to choose to
end his or her own life? What guarantees are there that the well-being
and true wishes of the patient will be the motivation for decisions?
The Act states that health care providers
are immune from civil and criminal charges if they conduct themselves
in "good faith compliance". This may be little comfort, as both
the guidebook and critics of the Act agree that the meaning of "good
faith" is unclear.
According to the Act, it is a Class A felony
for a health care provider to use "undue influence" on patients
to request assisted-suicide. However, this term is not defined in the
Act. The guidebook cautions providers that in other areas of the law "undue
influence" is also not precisely defined.
In addition, at the time of the guidebook’s
publication, the residency requirement had not been defined by the Act
or by administrative rule. This has the potential to result in a one-way
tourism industry.
If read carefully, the "Guidebook for
Health Care Providers" sends an ominous underlying message. It demonstrates
the potentially dangerous loopholes that may result in people being killed
against their wishes. Oregon’s slippery slope may be steeper and
much quicker than first imagined. History has taught us that, like in
the
Netherlands, no amount of safeguards will
prevent the taking of innocent human lives. @
Get Dr. and Mrs. Willke's New Book FREE!
Answers the "pro-choice" arguments
Entirely new teaching methods
Captures attention of conflicted middle
Documented Q & A format
New information on breast cancer, RU 486,
Post-Abortion Syndrome and more.
For the cost of shipping & handling,
we'll send you this book free. Even the phone call is free.
When you place your order and sign up with
LifeLine long distance service, we'll waive the shipping & handling
costs so that you don't pay a penny. You get lower long distance rates
and LifeLine will give10% of your paid bill to Life Issues Institute to
help save unborn babies.
Either way, the book is yours to keep.
This offer is limited, so call now.
Toll free 1-888-888-LIFE
International Right to Life Federation
Are you interested in what is going on in
other nations in the abortion and euthanasia struggle? If so, you will
probably be interested in subscribing to the IRTLF newsletter. This is
a four to eight-page publication which comes out every 6 to 8 weeks. Each
page contains from two to eight brief news reports from nations all over
the world.
It also informs you of activities of the
IRTLF. For instance:
In March, the IRTLF co-sponsored with the
British Society for the Protection of the Unborn Child a major seminar
in London on Compassionate Care of the Dying.
There were almost 500 people in attendance
from six nations. Prominent among the speakers was the president-elect
of the American Medical Association, Dr.
Nancy Dickey.
In April, five representatives journeyed
to Nairobi, Kenya, to put on an intensive, one-week seminar. Attending
were fifty assigned delegates from Sudan, Somalia,
Kenya, Uganda and Tanzania. The seminar was
to train them in the field of human sexuality. Its ultimate goal was to
prepare them to resist the genocidal population
control efforts of the United Nations. With
adequate understanding and considerable amounts of literature, they returned
to their countries to spread the word. The seminar was considered to be
a great success.
Coming up in October is the annual meeting
of the IRTLF conjoined with a major two-day seminar in Bangalore, India.
Following it, in late October, at the invitation
of the Bishops of the Philippines, a one-week seminar will be given, again
on the subject of the United Nations.
Traveling to and from India, members of the
board will be speaking in Singapore, Malaysia, Calcutta, Bombay, Nepal,
Goa, and other areas.
Finally, in December, IRTLF will sponsor
a three-day anti-euthanasia seminar in Amsterdam.
The IRTLF is a federation of almost 50 nations.
Its goal is pro-life education. On its board are territorial representatives
from 11 major geographic areas of the world. Its president, Dr. John C.
Willke, is also editor of its newsletter. A year’s subscription to
this newsletter is $20.00 and can be sent to International Right to
Life Newsletter, 1721 West Galbraith Road,
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45239. ~
Using Sports to Reach Youth
Editor's note: The primary goal of this publication
is to assist those in the daily battle to protect innocent human life.
That is why the Connector is sent, free of charge, to over 10,000 pro-life
leaders and educators. This goal is realized by sharing new and effective
tools and ideas with the pro-life movement. The following article is about
an organization that we believe holds great potential toward helping pro-lifers
achieve our life-protecting goals.
Life Athletes is an organization with three
primary goals: respect for the lives of the unborn and elderly, sexual
abstinence until marriage and virtue in the way we live our lives. As
its title suggests, the group uses professional and Olympic athletes to
further their cause. And the list is impressive. Yankees pitcher Andy
Pettitte, Green Bay Packers Reggie White and gold medal Olympiad Amanda
Borden are just three of the many high-profile athletes out front in their
support of this effort.
Others include: Mark Brunell -- quarterback
for the Jacksonville Jaguars, Dan Jansen -- gold medallist Olympic skater,
Ned Jarrett -- 2-time NASCAR champion,
Rebecca Lobo -- center with NY Liberty women's
professional basketball, Joe Mullen -- professional hockey player with
the Pittsburgh Penguins, and Herschel Walker -- running back with the
Dallas Cowboys. >From auto racing to golf, these athletes have united
in a common goal to help America's youth avoid the pitfalls that result
from today's promiscuous lifestyles.
Life Athletes president, Chris Godfrey, played
professional football for nine years. He was a starting right guard of
Super Bowl XXI champion New York Giants.
Now a member of the Indiana Bar, this father
of five heads an organization that makes a profound impact on this nation's
youth. Hundreds of thousands of high school and college students look
up to and admire professional and Olympic athletes. Life Athletes gives
them the opportunity to have role models that contrast the antics and
values of someone like Dennis Rodman.
One of the programs that brings together
pro-life athletes and youth are the sports camps, one-day events often
held in NFL cities around the nation. Football players constitute a majority
of the athletic representation, so the camps are often held in the local
NFL stadium. However, other sports such as baseball and swimming are well
represented. Camps have already been held in major cities like Tampa,
New York, Boston and Dallas. During these camps, impressionable youth
can talk one-on-one with role models who will provide them with the basics
in sports while encouraging them in key areas of their personal lives
-- time spent together that often leaves a lifetime impression. Check
out their website at lifeathletes.org for more information.
Life Athletes also offers speakers for a
myriad of events. They have been particularly effective when speaking
to youth. Since the athletes enthusiastically support the goals of the
organization, bringing a speaker to your area doesn't have to be a budget
buster. Keep in mind that the availability of an athlete is a key factor.
It is often difficult to secure a speaker during their playing season.
However, Julie Makimaa in the national office will be happy to assist
you through the process.
Life Athletes has a new generation of tools
to help you share the pro-life message in your local area. They've just
released an impressive, fast-moving five-minute video starring several
of their athletes. It masterfully combines music and images to instill
the values of life, abstinence and virtue. A new brochure and wall posters
reinforce the message. In addition, they offer a variety of cool clothing
and novelty items to help promote the cause.
For more information, contact Life Athletes
at 400 Plaza Building, 210 S. Michigan, South Bend, IN 46601. Phone (219)
237-0905. }
STATES EXCHANGE
Something New in Abstinence Education
Many pro-life organizations include abstinence
as one of the life issues they deal with. On the other hand, several view
the topic as removed from the realm of a"single issue" pro-life
approach. If you fit the first classification, or if your organization
is interested in including abstinence as part of your curriculum, we'd
like to tell you about an effective new product.
Sex Respect is well known to advocates of
saving sex for marriage. This nationally-acclaimed program has been used
in 1,200 school districts. Itstried-and-true-reputation has made it a
model for abstinence-based education.
Coleen Kelly Mast is the mastermind behind
this wait-for-marriage message. She developed the Sex Respect concept
and program in preparation for her Masters of Science in Health Education
from Western Illinois University. Mrs. Mast has just released a new five-part
video, well suited for a classroom or educational environment. The segments,
ranging from 15 to 27 minutes, are titled: Not Doing It, Why I Waited,
But You Can't Hide, Done That…Changed My Ways, and Dating…Predator
or Partner. The video uses music and a fresh new style to meet today's
youth where they are and hold their attention.
What makes this program even more effective
is the accompanying workbook. It challenges the young participants to
thoroughly think through the issue of premarital sex. This often causes
them to reconsider a previous notion that sex outside of marriage has
a positive impact on their lives.
Life Issues Institute highly recommends the
Sex Respect Video Series. We encourage those of you who include abstinence
as part of your message to consider adding it to your arsenal to combat
the pervasive message of safe sex in today's society. For more information,
contact Respect, Inc., PO Box 349, Bradley, IL 60914. Phone (815) 932-8389,
or check them out on the Internet at sexresspect.com.
|
