Life
Issues Institute's Position on Harriet Miers
for the Supreme Court
Much
has been written on and speculated about Harriet Miers, President Bushs
nominee to replace Sandra Day OConnor on the Supreme Court. Many pro-lifers
have expressed disappointment, while some pro-abortion Senators have indicated
support.
There is not enough information
on Ms. Miers to confidently say that she will vote to correct Roe v. Wade.
However, there are several indications that make us cautiously optimistic. Allow
me to share them with you, and then you can make up your own mind.
President Bush is without question pro-life. Nearly all of
his court appointments to date have been excellent. Evidence is good that Chief
Justice John Roberts will perform admirably on the Supreme Court. President Bush
has earned a high level of trust and respect from the pro-life community. I believe
his heart is with us on abortion.
Those
who know Harriet Miers depict her as a devout evangelical Christian, active in
her church. A persons religious beliefs are the foundation of his or her
actions. Ms. Miers is obviously a strong person. She was the first woman president
of a major law firm and the first woman president of the Texas Bar Association.
Thus her convictions, whatever they may be, are likely strong.
As President of the Texas Bar Association, Ms. Miers was the
chief sponsor of a resolution to change the pro-abortion position of the American
Bar Association to one of neutrality. While her efforts failed, she made an impressive
attempt.
Harriet Miers has on various
occasions attended, and made a donation to, a fund raising banquet for Texans
for Life, a pro-life organization.
Ms.
Miers statements and efforts as White House Council clearly indicate she
has a philosophy of judicial restraint. This makes it more unlikely that she would
support Roe v. Wade. We do not expect her to be a judicial activist. In
her acceptance speech with the President, Ms. Miers said, It is the responsibility
of every generation to be true to the founders vision of the proper role
of the courts and our society.
It
appeared that she was on pro-abortion Senate Minority Leader, Harry Reids,
suggested list for replacing OConnor. This may rightly give some cause for
pause. Further, Senator Reid has made positive remarks about Ms. Miers. It is
also true that Harriet Miers gave $1,000 to presidential primary candidate Al
Gore in 1988.
Pro-lifers painfully remember
that pro-life Republican presidents nominated pro-abortion Justices OConnor,
Souter and Kennedy to the Court. And since the Supreme Court is our most viable
option to ending the modern-day holocaust of abortion, we can ill-afford another
tragic mistake. Ultimately, we will only be certain of Ms. Miers legal position
on abortion after she has been confirmed and rules on an abortion-related case.
In the final analysis, after reviewing all of the known facts,
Life Issues Institute feels the odds of her opposing Roe are seemingly
to our advantage. That is why we are cautiously optimistic she is the right pick
for the Court. Obviously, you will have to make up your own mind.
We will continue to closely monitor the situation and bring
you important facts as they develop. Please continue to pray for President Bush,
Harriet Miers, the Supreme Court and our nation. Please pray that God will end
abortion in America.
Sincerely for the
babies,
Bradley Mattes
Executive Director
Life Issues Institute
10/05/05