Rights for Rivers but Not Babies

Back
Placeholder Image

Rights for Rivers but Not Babies

Bradley Mattes   |   March 29, 2017

More and more environmental organizations are voicing support for abortion as a way to protect the environment.  Now we’re seeing laws bestowing rights to nature, such as rivers in New Zealand and the United Kingdom.  As a result, anyone can sue in a court of law in the name of defending nature.  So rivers, plants and animals would have the same rights as human beings.  It’s no leap in logic to impose abortion on demand throughout pregnancy because human beings are considered a blight on nature.  Even cities like Santa Monica, California, where there’s really no nature to protect, instituted a law recognizing the “rights of nature.”   Make no mistake, radical environmentalism has become a zealous religion that’s imposing its belief on society at the expense of innocent human life.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Latest News

From our articles & videos

View all

April 18, 2024

Perinatal Hospice, the Most Loving Option

Few things in life derail a parent’s world more than being informed that the unborn baby they were excitedly anticipating...

Read More

April 11, 2024

Abortion and Cardiovascular Diseases

A variety of health risks are associated with pregnancy loss defined as abortion or miscarriage. They include but are not...

Read More

April 05, 2024

Normalizing Euthanasia, the Façade is Gone.

Enemies of life are now openly attempting to normalize euthanasia, painting it as the responsible thing to do if you...

Read More